Skip to content
9/8/20254 min

Antes de financiación, busca evidencia

Categories
Tips
Finance

What is the first thing you need to launch your project? Many entrepreneurs before even if you’ve done any Experiment, they’ll respond that the number one priority is money. And this is a mistake, because before funding, what every project requires is evidence.

The goal at the start isn’t to seem like a “fundable” project to prepare a round, but demonstrate that there’s a real signal that a market exists. That is, right now, at the stage you’re in, the question isn’t “How do I make my idea attractive to investors?”, but “What proof tells me if it’s worth continuing?”.

Such proof won’t come with the money, but with the real behavior of your Early Adopters. With funding you can build an MVP or have a stunning landing page, but that’s useless if no one is interested in your product. It may seem like you’re making progress, but you’ll be increasing the cost of a Hypothesis that you still don’t know if it’s worth developing. You’ll only make progress if you’re certain that someone responds to your proposal with interest, time, data, use, or by purchasing what you offer. Now, what happens when you don’t have those signals?

Funding vs. lack of signal

Often you won’t see the Expected signal in your Experiments. Y es fácil pensar: “si tuviera dinero, podría construir el producto, lanzar más deprisa y empezar a vender. Esas ventas validarían mi proyecto”. 

In most cases, that idea is an elegant way to evitar una  pregunta incómoda: ¿por qué las señales que he obtenido son débiles o inexistentes?

The answer will almost never be: I need more money. First, you need to better understand what is happening, and to do that you should talk to more customers, narrow down the segment, change the Experiment, simplify the proposal… in other words, take actions that will give you more clarity. None of these have anything to do with investment; the funding never fixes a problem caused by lack of validation. 

If there’s no clear signal that the market wants what you’re building, money won’t “buy” it. In that case, the only thing you’ll achieve with funding is to move faster… in the wrong direction.

The risks of seeking funding too early

Funding can be useful, of course. But that is when it accelerates something that’s already starting to work, not by trying to compensate for something that hasn’t been validated yet. If you seek resources too soon:

  • You’ll turn Hypotheses into fixed costs. You’ll start investing in product, structure, or marketing before knowing if you’re solving a relevant problem for someone.

  • You’ll reduce your ability to learn. When you focus on getting money, you put secondary the only important thing in the initial stage of a project: talking to users, launching Experiments and understanding what truly works.

The goal at this stage isn’t to build faster, but reduce uncertainty at the lowest possible cost. Evidence reduces risks; capital, on its own, does not.

So, when does it make sense to look for funding?

The answer would be: when the money will accelerate an evidence that already exists, not replace the missing one.

That is, when:

  • You understand precisely what problem it solves your idea.

  • You know for whom it’s especially important that pain.

  • You have a proposal that generates interest or real use.

  • You start to see evidence that people end up, recommend, pay or take other actions that indicate that there is a real value.

In this scenario, funding can help you gain speed. Before that, all it will do is push you to to spend faster.

If someone pays for my product, is that funding?

Yes and no: you’re at the beginning of your project, checking if your idea has an impact on someone. Money at this stage, achieved through your Experiments, it tells you the pain you’ve identified is real and forces you to refine your value proposition. That money validates.

That’s why it makes more sense first look for financing methods tied to the market: pre-sales, paid pilots, etc. Not because raising investment is bad, but because later you’ll be in a better position to do so, since you’ll have learned something real.

That evidence will pave the way for more advanced stages of your venture: when you talk to potential investors and to show clear signals (returning users, pilots progressing, paying customers, qualified waitlists, well-defined problems), everything will change. You won’t be by selling an empty promise, you’ll be demonstrating that the market has started to respond.

Related